Triple
T7197367
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tremont |
E168649
|
entity |
| Predicate | microarchitectureGeneration |
P75681
|
FINISHED |
| Object | successor of Goldmont Plus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: successor of Goldmont Plus | Statement: [Tremont, microarchitectureGeneration, successor of Goldmont Plus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: microarchitectureGeneration Context triple: [Tremont, microarchitectureGeneration, successor of Goldmont Plus]
-
A.
microarchitectureFeature
Indicates a relationship where a specific microarchitecture possesses or supports a particular hardware or design feature.
-
B.
cpuCoreMicroarchitecture
Indicates the specific microarchitecture design implemented in a given CPU core.
-
C.
cpuArchitecture
Indicates the type of processor instruction set or hardware architecture that a computing system or component is designed to run on.
-
D.
graphicsArchitecture
Indicates the underlying design or structural framework that defines how a system’s graphics or visual rendering components are organized and operate.
-
E.
cpuModel
Indicates the specific processor model associated with a given computing device or system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5376748190bb500f03df86e93e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e928ecdc8190a7f3feaf6d28781b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e752385c819096fbab55566ee2a8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6e8b5f6508190af28e06a7959d717 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.