Triple
T7196441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | OWL 2 RL |
E168626
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSemanticsCompatibleWith |
P52899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RDF-based semantics of OWL 2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RDF-based semantics of OWL 2 | Statement: [OWL 2 RL, hasSemanticsCompatibleWith, RDF-based semantics of OWL 2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSemanticsCompatibleWith Context triple: [OWL 2 RL, hasSemanticsCompatibleWith, RDF-based semantics of OWL 2]
-
A.
hasSemantics
Indicates that one entity carries or encodes the meaning, interpretation, or semantic content associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasSemanticsDefinedBy
Indicates that the meaning or interpretation of one entity is specified, constrained, or determined by another entity.
-
C.
checksCompatibilityWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
D.
hasSemanticRestriction
Indicates that a concept or relation is constrained in meaning or usage by specific semantic conditions or limitations.
-
E.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68a5376748190bb500f03df86e93e |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e928ecdc8190a7f3feaf6d28781b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e752385c819096fbab55566ee2a8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:51 p.m.