Triple
T7193398
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Glossip v. Gross |
E167748
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Baze v. Rees |
E649389
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baze v. Rees | Statement: [Glossip v. Gross, relatedCase, Baze v. Rees]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Baze v. Rees Context triple: [Glossip v. Gross, relatedCase, Baze v. Rees]
-
A.
Baze v. Rees
chosen
Baze v. Rees is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of a three-drug lethal injection protocol under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
Reese v. United States
Reese v. United States is an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal enforcement of African Americans’ voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment during the Reconstruction era.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
E.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888b5248819090499a884ee3ec39 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e9036544819083c70a5d2135ba4b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7cbe7d42c8190915fd0713523cbb0 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 12:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:50 p.m.