Triple

T7176767
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Humanism E167338 entity
Predicate drawsInspirationFrom P61130 FINISHED
Object classical antiquity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: classical antiquity | Statement: [Humanism, drawsInspirationFrom, classical antiquity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: drawsInspirationFrom
Context triple: [Humanism, drawsInspirationFrom, classical antiquity]
  • A. genreOfInspiration
    Indicates that one entity serves as the inspirational genre or stylistic source for the creation, style, or classification of another entity.
  • B. inspiredByOrRelatedTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity draws inspiration from, is influenced by, or is otherwise thematically or conceptually connected to another entity.
  • C. hasInspirationSource
    Indicates that something derives its creative motivation, ideas, or influence from a particular source.
  • D. hasInspired
    Indicates that one entity has served as a source of motivation, creativity, or influence leading to ideas, actions, or works in another entity.
  • E. inspiredAuthor
    Indicates that one entity served as a source of creative or intellectual inspiration for an author entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68889a2748190a316c5e65360361a completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e9b045c48190b27b2d6f7c11026f completed March 27, 2026, 8:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e74fb0f48190b2ad4dd4efdd241a completed March 27, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:49 p.m.