Triple
T7175082
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Guilfoyle |
E167299
|
entity |
| Predicate | name |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | William Guilfoyle |
E167299
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: William Guilfoyle | Statement: [William Guilfoyle, name, William Guilfoyle]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: William Guilfoyle Context triple: [William Guilfoyle, name, William Guilfoyle]
-
A.
William Guilfoyle
chosen
William Guilfoyle was a 19th-century Australian landscape gardener and botanist best known for transforming Melbourne’s Royal Botanic Gardens into a picturesque, internationally acclaimed garden.
-
B.
George A. Reid
George A. Reid is a mathematician known for supervising the doctoral work of prominent symplectic topologist Dusa McDuff.
-
C.
Tom Roberts
Tom Roberts was a leading Australian painter and key figure in the Heidelberg School, renowned for his influential role in the development of Australian Impressionism.
-
D.
James Sansbury
James Sansbury is a technology entrepreneur best known as a co-founder of the software company Altera.
-
E.
George Deakin
George Deakin is an individual known for being a defendant in the 1979 English criminal case R v Thorpe and Others.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68889a2748190a316c5e65360361a |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e88d770c8190b8d06dcd08447c08 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7b9281e808190ac2a8ad585a70ea0 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 11:19 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:48 p.m.