Triple

T7165163
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lusoponte E167047 entity
Predicate hasConcessionRole P37449 FINISHED
Object design LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: design | Statement: [Lusoponte, hasConcessionRole, design]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConcessionRole
Context triple: [Lusoponte, hasConcessionRole, design]
  • A. hasConcessions
    Indicates that one entity provides or contains concession facilities, services, or rights (such as food, drink, or merchandise sales) for another entity or within a given context.
  • B. hasConcessionaire chosen
    Indicates that one entity is designated as the concessionaire (holder of operating or usage rights under a concession) for another entity.
  • C. hasCapitalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds an official role, function, or status specifically associated with a capital city.
  • D. hasNotableRoleIn
    Indicates that an entity holds a significant or noteworthy role or function within another entity, event, work, or context.
  • E. concessionType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of concession (such as a discount, exemption, or special allowance) that applies in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68888c10c819095e0383020225758 completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e832d2548190aacff0de80dbc268 completed March 27, 2026, 8:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e1cd5c948190a9113b23f7308c21 completed March 27, 2026, 8 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:47 p.m.