Triple
T7154766
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Société Anonyme |
E166781
|
entity |
| Predicate | shareStructure |
P7881
|
FINISHED |
| Object | share-based capital |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: share-based capital | Statement: [Société Anonyme, shareStructure, share-based capital]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: shareStructure Context triple: [Société Anonyme, shareStructure, share-based capital]
-
A.
sharesOwnershipStructureWith
Indicates that two entities have the same or closely aligned ownership structure, such as sharing the same owners, parent company, or control hierarchy.
-
B.
ownershipStructure
chosen
Indicates how ownership or control is distributed among entities within an organization or asset.
-
C.
sharesTypeWith
Indicates that two entities belong to the same type or category.
-
D.
sharesBaseWith
Indicates that two entities have a common underlying base element, source, or component from which they are derived or constructed.
-
E.
sharesUniverseWith
Indicates that two entities exist within the same fictional or narrative universe, implying shared continuity, setting, or canon.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68887a5cc8190bec0ea96227164f7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e80c747c8190a017a2b1c3e78a3f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1caf4e48190b47bb398a3c1554d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:46 p.m.