Triple

T7151361
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minkowski interval E166697 entity
Predicate hasSignatureConvention P22945 FINISHED
Object (-,+,+,+) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: (-,+,+,+) | Statement: [Minkowski interval, hasSignatureConvention, (-,+,+,+)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSignatureConvention
Context triple: [Minkowski interval, hasSignatureConvention, (-,+,+,+)]
  • A. hasSignConvention chosen
    Indicates that a particular system, quantity, or representation follows a specified rule for assigning positive and negative signs.
  • B. hasSignatureTrait
    Indicates that an entity possesses a defining or characteristic trait that is especially distinctive or representative of it.
  • C. hasSignatureConcept
    Indicates that something is associated with or characterized by a defining concept that uniquely represents its core meaning or identity.
  • D. signingConvention
    Indicates that one party formally agrees to and adopts the terms of a convention, treaty, or formal agreement.
  • E. hasSignatureBit
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific bit or flag used to represent a signature or signed status in a data structure or encoding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68886779c8190a8e3fbabffe68253 completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e7f3e4a88190a3110f2368262528 completed March 27, 2026, 8:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e1caf4e48190b47bb398a3c1554d completed March 27, 2026, 8 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:46 p.m.