Triple
T7131735
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Phocaea |
E166204
|
entity |
| Predicate | colonizedRegion |
P51285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | western Mediterranean |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: western Mediterranean | Statement: [Phocaea, colonizedRegion, western Mediterranean]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonizedRegion Context triple: [Phocaea, colonizedRegion, western Mediterranean]
-
A.
colonized
Indicates that one entity established control over and settled in the territory of another entity, often imposing its own systems, structures, or population there.
-
B.
settledRegion
chosen
Indicates that an entity has established a lasting presence or habitation within a particular geographic region.
-
C.
colonizedFor
Indicates that one entity established control over and settled another entity or area for its own use or benefit.
-
D.
colonialOffshoot
Indicates that one entity originated as a colony or derivative settlement established by another entity.
-
E.
neighboringColonialRegion
Indicates that one colonial region is geographically adjacent to or directly borders another colonial region.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68884a9388190af42f90d1c1a7151 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e66f15b88190bc1fb0f0a8af16a6 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c7289881909f3b533c384f9ed4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:44 p.m.