Triple
T7125982
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sixes River |
E166062
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWatershedType |
P49162
|
FINISHED |
| Object | scenic watershed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: scenic watershed | Statement: [Sixes River, hasWatershedType, scenic watershed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWatershedType Context triple: [Sixes River, hasWatershedType, scenic watershed]
-
A.
hasWatershed
Indicates that one geographic area or feature is part of, drains into, or is hydrologically defined by a particular watershed.
-
B.
hasWatershedWith
Indicates that two geographic areas share or are associated with the same watershed or drainage basin.
-
C.
hasWatershedCharacteristic
Indicates that a watershed possesses a specified characteristic, feature, or property.
-
D.
watershedType
chosen
Indicates the classification or category of a watershed associated with an entity (e.g., by hydrologic, ecological, or management type).
-
E.
hasHydrologicalType
Indicates a relationship where an entity is classified according to its hydrological category or type (e.g., river, lake, aquifer).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888350588190870cd552b427a1cd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e64d99888190a93c1822e19b5457 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c7289881909f3b533c384f9ed4 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:44 p.m.