Triple
T7112247
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Matthew Shepard |
E165732
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCase |
P3996
|
FINISHED |
| Object | State of Wyoming v. Russell Henderson |
E641696
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: State of Wyoming v. Russell Henderson | Statement: [Matthew Shepard, legalCase, State of Wyoming v. Russell Henderson]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: State of Wyoming v. Russell Henderson Context triple: [Matthew Shepard, legalCase, State of Wyoming v. Russell Henderson]
-
A.
State of Wyoming v. Aaron McKinney
chosen
State of Wyoming v. Aaron McKinney is the criminal case in which Aaron McKinney was prosecuted and convicted for the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard, a killing that drew national attention to anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes in the United States.
-
B.
Wolf v. Colorado
Wolf v. Colorado was a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, a position later reversed by Mapp v. Ohio.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
United States v. Ryan
United States v. Ryan is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the landmark 1883 Civil Rights Cases, which curtailed federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
-
E.
Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States
Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States is the formal case title of the U.S. Supreme Court decision commonly known as Printz v. United States, which addressed the limits of federal power to compel state officials to enforce federal law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888120f081908f8f01b201dc4a4c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e5edf89c8190a069b35ff7768165 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7a325a07c81909bd9a8f5d4461fb9 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:43 p.m.