Triple
T7112180
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Public Law 111-84, Division E |
E165731
|
entity |
| Predicate | expandsProtectionTo |
P9292
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gender |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gender | Statement: [Public Law 111-84, Division E, expandsProtectionTo, gender]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: expandsProtectionTo Context triple: [Public Law 111-84, Division E, expandsProtectionTo, gender]
-
A.
expandedProtectionTo
chosen
Indicates that an existing protection, safeguard, or coverage was broadened to include an additional entity, group, area, or scope.
-
B.
addsProtectionFor
Indicates that one entity provides or increases protective measures or safeguards for another entity.
-
C.
permitsExpansionOf
Indicates that one entity authorizes or enables the enlargement, extension, or increase in scope of another entity.
-
D.
supportedExpansionOf
Indicates that one entity actively aided, endorsed, or facilitated the growth, extension, or enlargement of another entity or domain.
-
E.
restrictedExpansionOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is an expansion of another, but with added constraints or limitations that make it more specific or narrowly applicable than the original.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888120f081908f8f01b201dc4a4c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e5edf89c8190a069b35ff7768165 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c4f9788190830288d00cc37026 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:43 p.m.