Triple
T7107038
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mixtec languages |
E165614
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oto-Manguean languages |
C12029
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Oto-Manguean languages Context triple: [Mixtec languages, instanceOf, Oto-Manguean languages]
-
A.
Oto-Manguean language
chosen
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
-
B.
Penutian languages subgroup
The Penutian languages subgroup is a proposed family of Native American languages, primarily spoken in western North America, that are hypothesized to share a common ancestral origin based on structural and lexical similarities.
-
C.
Banda languages
Banda languages are a group of closely related Ubangian languages spoken primarily in the Central African Republic and neighboring regions, characterized by shared phonological and grammatical features.
-
D.
Uto-Aztecan language
A Uto-Aztecan language is a member of a Native American language family spoken from the western United States through northern and central Mexico, sharing common ancestral linguistic features despite diverse cultures and regions.
-
E.
Tai-Kadai language
A Tai-Kadai language is a member of a family of tonal languages spoken primarily in Southeast Asia and southern China, characterized by similar phonological, lexical, and grammatical features that suggest a common historical origin.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6888120f081908f8f01b201dc4a4c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:42 p.m.