Triple

T7094422
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda E165284 entity
Predicate consolidatedWith P7838 FINISHED
Object R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission E165285 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | Statement: [Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda, consolidatedWith, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Context triple: [Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda, consolidatedWith, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]
  • A. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission chosen
    R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether federal employment discrimination law protects transgender employees from being fired because of their gender identity.
  • B. EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.
    EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc. is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission can pursue victim-specific relief in court for an employee despite that employee’s agreement to arbitrate disputes with the employer.
  • C. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
    Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
  • D. Hall v. DeCuir
    Hall v. DeCuir was an 1878 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority to regulate racial segregation in interstate transportation, reinforcing federal primacy over interstate commerce.
  • E. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 completed March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7ad83aa288190b06262ac9898f5c1 completed March 28, 2026, 10:29 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.