Triple

T7094326
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. E165282 entity
Predicate partyIn P1790 FINISHED
Object Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. E31058 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. | Statement: [Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., partyIn, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.
Context triple: [Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., partyIn, Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.]
  • A. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. chosen
    Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held same-sex workplace harassment is actionable under Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination.
  • B. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • C. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • D. Hurd v. Hodge
    Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Collin v. Smith
    Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 completed March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7ad83aa288190b06262ac9898f5c1 completed March 28, 2026, 10:29 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.