Triple
T7094143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. |
E165277
|
entity |
| Predicate | reversedOrVacated |
P4514
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | Statement: [Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., reversedOrVacated, judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reversedOrVacated Context triple: [Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., reversedOrVacated, judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit]
-
A.
reversed
Indicates that the direction or order of a previously defined relationship or sequence between entities is inverted.
-
B.
repealed
Indicates that a law, rule, or regulation has been officially revoked or annulled so that it no longer has legal effect.
-
C.
wasOverturnedByCourt
chosen
Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
-
D.
overturnedDecisionOf
Indicates that one decision reversed, nullified, or set aside a previous decision.
-
E.
overturnedLaw
Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1c172148190bf290c07bf579d1f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.