Triple
T706453
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leiden |
E14108
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableResident |
P1092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jan Steen |
E20539
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jan Steen | Statement: [Leiden, hasNotableResident, Jan Steen]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jan Steen Context triple: [Leiden, hasNotableResident, Jan Steen]
-
A.
Jan Steen
chosen
Jan Steen was a Dutch Golden Age painter renowned for his lively, often humorous depictions of everyday life and chaotic household scenes.
-
B.
Pieter de Hooch
Pieter de Hooch was a Dutch Golden Age painter renowned for his intimate domestic interior scenes and masterful use of light and perspective.
-
C.
Jan Lievens
Jan Lievens was a Dutch Golden Age painter known for his dramatic use of light and shadow and his early collaboration and stylistic parallels with Rembrandt.
-
D.
Frans Hals
Frans Hals was a prominent Dutch Golden Age painter renowned for his lively, expressive portraiture and innovative brushwork.
-
E.
Govert Flinck
Govert Flinck was a prominent 17th-century Dutch Golden Age painter known for his portraits and history paintings, strongly influenced by his early training in Rembrandt’s workshop.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493494ec48190ae6751683625a9ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a54607f08190b3ee4805f2ea4b2f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ad8a8f35d48190a18cf924bf5f9e45 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.