Triple

T7032983
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Intel 80486 E163312 entity
Predicate performanceImprovementReason P74576 FINISHED
Object integrated FPU LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: integrated FPU | Statement: [Intel 80486, performanceImprovementReason, integrated FPU]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: performanceImprovementReason
Context triple: [Intel 80486, performanceImprovementReason, integrated FPU]
  • A. performanceTuningBy
    Indicates that an entity’s performance has been adjusted, optimized, or fine-tuned by another entity.
  • B. improvesOn
    Indicates that one entity enhances, refines, or performs better than another entity, typically by addressing its limitations or increasing its effectiveness.
  • C. performanceFocus
    Indicates that an entity directs attention or effort toward improving or emphasizing performance in a given context.
  • D. seeksToImprove
    Indicates an intentional effort by one entity to make another entity or condition better than its current state.
  • E. performance
    Indicates that one entity’s effectiveness, quality, or success in carrying out a task, function, or role is being evaluated or characterized in relation to some standard or expectation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6885d691c81908cf7d31083113886 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e458ad9c81908c3f492b317ce291 completed March 27, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e1b9a2488190aea351d96afa5a12 completed March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6e456e89481908df42a1b4232a4a0 completed March 27, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:36 p.m.