Triple

T7030603
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Conway chained arrow notation E163257 entity
Predicate representationStyle P21655 FINISHED
Object finite symbolic expressions for enormous integers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: finite symbolic expressions for enormous integers | Statement: [Conway chained arrow notation, representationStyle, finite symbolic expressions for enormous integers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: representationStyle
Context triple: [Conway chained arrow notation, representationStyle, finite symbolic expressions for enormous integers]
  • A. representationType chosen
    Indicates the specific form or mode in which something is represented or expressed (e.g., as a symbol, image, model, or description).
  • B. structuralStyle
    Indicates the architectural or design style that characterizes the structure or form of an entity.
  • C. symbolicStyle
    Indicates that one entity employs or is characterized by a particular symbolic or emblematic style defined by the other entity.
  • D. structureStyle
    Indicates the architectural or design style characterizing how a structure is built or formed.
  • E. representation
    Indicates that one entity stands in for, symbolizes, or depicts another entity in some context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6885d691c81908cf7d31083113886 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e458ad9c81908c3f492b317ce291 completed March 27, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e1b9a2488190aea351d96afa5a12 completed March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:35 p.m.