Triple

T7030544
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Conway’s Doomsday algorithm E163256 entity
Predicate hasReferenceDate P27895 FINISHED
Object 4/4 (4 April) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4/4 (4 April) | Statement: [Conway’s Doomsday algorithm, hasReferenceDate, 4/4 (4 April)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReferenceDate
Context triple: [Conway’s Doomsday algorithm, hasReferenceDate, 4/4 (4 April)]
  • A. hasDateWith
    Indicates that one entity is scheduled to go on or is engaged in a romantic or social date with another entity.
  • B. hasBaseDate chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific reference or starting date used as the basis for related calculations, schedules, or validity periods.
  • C. hasReferenceID
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific reference identifier used to uniquely track or distinguish it.
  • D. hasCaptureDate
    Indicates the date on which something (such as an image, video, or data sample) was originally captured or recorded.
  • E. dateOf
    Indicates that one entity specifies the calendar date associated with another entity, such as when it occurred, was created, or is scheduled.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6885d691c81908cf7d31083113886 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e458ad9c81908c3f492b317ce291 completed March 27, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6e1b9a2488190aea351d96afa5a12 completed March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:35 p.m.