Triple
T7026533
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pacific FC |
E162960
|
entity |
| Predicate | city |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Langford |
E198035
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Langford | Statement: [Pacific FC, city, Langford]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Langford Context triple: [Pacific FC, city, Langford]
-
A.
Langford
Langford is a small rural village in North Somerset, England, known for its countryside setting and proximity to Wrington.
-
B.
Langford
Langford is a small rural village in the Cotswolds area of Oxfordshire, England, known for its historic stone buildings and traditional English countryside setting.
-
C.
Langford
chosen
Langford is a rapidly growing suburban city on southern Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada, located just west of Victoria.
-
D.
Langford Village
Langford Village is a modern residential suburb of the town of Bicester in Oxfordshire, England.
-
E.
Lackford
Lackford is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk, known for its surrounding countryside and nearby nature reserve.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885b26248190a857541e3d10e299 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e1fd6ab48190865271e16e8ff669 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:01 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c77588285481909799a2bb76921b9a |
completed | March 28, 2026, 6:30 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:35 p.m.