Triple

T702472
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Silk Road routes E14028 entity
Predicate hasComponentRoute P18687 FINISHED
Object overland routes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: overland routes | Statement: [Silk Road routes, hasComponentRoute, overland routes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasComponentRoute
Context triple: [Silk Road routes, hasComponentRoute, overland routes]
  • A. hasRoute
    Indicates that there exists a path or connection enabling travel or communication from one entity to another.
  • B. hasRouteType
    Indicates that there is a specific kind or category of route associated with an entity (e.g., road, rail, bus line).
  • C. hasNotableRoute
    Indicates that an entity (such as a transportation service or pathway) includes or is associated with a route that is considered significant, well-known, or otherwise noteworthy.
  • D. hasComponentCommand
    Indicates that an entity includes or controls another entity as a subordinate or component command within an organizational or command structure.
  • E. hasComponentProgram
    Indicates that one program includes or is composed of another program as a component or sub-program.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493494ec48190ae6751683625a9ba completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a58d4c3c8190ad4527d14bca5e6e completed March 1, 2026, 8:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4edc33881909a978268f6dd5d82 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4a58c0a84819094f07658dc651b36 completed March 1, 2026, 8:46 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.