Triple
T7020116
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Liberation |
E162798
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasArtistRoleOfBunnyWailer |
P9640
|
FINISHED |
| Object | singer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: singer | Statement: [Liberation, hasArtistRoleOfBunnyWailer, singer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArtistRoleOfBunnyWailer Context triple: [Liberation, hasArtistRoleOfBunnyWailer, singer]
-
A.
hasArtistRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves in the capacity or role of an artist in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
hasBandMember
Indicates that a musical group includes a specific individual as one of its members.
-
C.
hasArtist
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or item) is associated with or created by a specific artist.
-
D.
workedAsSessionMusicianFor
Indicates that one entity performed as a session musician providing musical services or recordings for another entity, typically an artist, band, or production.
-
E.
bandMemberContributor
Indicates that an entity contributes to a band in the role of a member, participating in its musical or creative activities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885b26248190a857541e3d10e299 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6e5ecd4488190bf19e42de55da98b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6e1b8118481909d76eb6616160e80 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:34 p.m.