Triple
T7006922
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Woodbury County, Iowa |
E162479
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sergeant Bluff, Iowa |
E489298
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sergeant Bluff, Iowa | Statement: [Woodbury County, Iowa, contains, Sergeant Bluff, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sergeant Bluff, Iowa Context triple: [Woodbury County, Iowa, contains, Sergeant Bluff, Iowa]
-
A.
Sergeant Bluff, Iowa
chosen
Sergeant Bluff, Iowa is a small city in Woodbury County that functions as a residential and industrial community just south of Sioux City in the state’s northwest region.
-
B.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
C.
McClelland, Iowa
McClelland, Iowa is a small rural community located in Pottawattamie County in the western part of the state.
-
D.
Sibley, Iowa
Sibley, Iowa is a small city in northwestern Iowa that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Osceola County.
-
E.
Shenandoah, Iowa
Shenandoah, Iowa is a small city in southwestern Iowa known historically as a regional agricultural and broadcasting center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6885928148190ae31909fbb5e9849 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6dc35cb848190a839919021efce81 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:36 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c76a43c3a081909b9150d36ba107f5 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:33 p.m.