Triple

T700425
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject French E13984 entity
Predicate usesDefiniteArticles P5228 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [French, usesDefiniteArticles, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesDefiniteArticles
Context triple: [French, usesDefiniteArticles, yes]
  • A. usesDefiniteArticlePosition
    Indicates that a definite article appears in a specific syntactic or positional slot relative to another element in the expression.
  • B. hasDefiniteArticle chosen
    Indicates that the referenced entity or term is accompanied by a definite article (such as "the") in the given context.
  • C. hasNoIndefiniteArticle
    Indicates that the related entity is expressed without an indefinite article (such as “a” or “an”) in the given linguistic context.
  • D. usesPostpositions
    Indicates that one entity employs postpositions, placing relational or grammatical markers after the words they modify rather than before them.
  • E. hasDefinitenessDistinction
    Indicates that a language or system grammatically distinguishes between definite and indefinite (or otherwise specified) reference in its expressions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4a544e3608190ac315c7aa9f88e7e completed March 1, 2026, 8:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4a4ec8c748190b198492a0eea4445 completed March 1, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.