Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores congruence and proportionality test | Statement: [Enforcement Clause, standardArticulatedIn, City of Boerne v. Flores congruence and proportionality test]

Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores congruence and proportionality test
Context triple: [Enforcement Clause, standardArticulatedIn, City of Boerne v. Flores congruence and proportionality test]

• A. City of Boerne v. Flores chosen
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• B. Van Orden v. Perry
  Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
• C. Lynch v. Donnelly
  Lynch v. Donnelly is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the inclusion of a nativity scene in a city’s Christmas display and helped shape modern Establishment Clause analysis of government endorsement of religion.
• D. Plyler v. Doe
  Plyler v. Doe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states cannot deny free public education to children based on their immigration status, recognizing such exclusion as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
• E. South Dakota v. Dole
  South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: standardArticulatedIn
Context triple: [Enforcement Clause, standardArticulatedIn, City of Boerne v. Flores congruence and proportionality test]

• A. standardType
  Indicates that one entity is classified as the standard, canonical, or reference type for another entity or context.
• B. standardApplied
  Indicates that a particular standard, rule, or guideline has been put into effect or used as the basis for an action or decision in the relationship.
• C. articulated chosen
  Indicates that one entity has expressed, formulated, or clearly stated another entity (such as an idea, plan, or position) in words or another communicative form.
• D. standardComposition
  Indicates that one entity is composed or constructed according to a recognized or conventional standard defined by another entity.
• E. standardizedIn
  Indicates that something has been formally defined, regulated, or made uniform within a particular standard, framework, or jurisdiction.
• F. None of above.