Triple
T6991694
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thompson's algorithm |
E162099
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsOperator |
P31805
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concatenation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concatenation | Statement: [Thompson's algorithm, supportsOperator, concatenation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsOperator Context triple: [Thompson's algorithm, supportsOperator, concatenation]
-
A.
supportsOperationsIn
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or backs the execution of operations within a specified context, area, or domain of another entity.
-
B.
operationSupported
chosen
Indicates that a particular operation is available and can be performed or handled by a given entity or system.
-
C.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
D.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
E.
supportedAs
Indicates that one entity is accepted, recognized, or treated as being in the role, type, or representation of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68856d7808190ab33ee914640281b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6dbc1f63c8190837cfd71cf5ed613 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d7c4a18881908d267137daed828b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:32 p.m.