Triple
T6991675
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Thompson's algorithm |
E162099
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | automata theory technique |
C21892
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: automata theory technique Context triple: [Thompson's algorithm, instanceOf, automata theory technique]
-
A.
automated theorem proving technique
An automated theorem proving technique is a systematic, algorithmic method used by computer programs to derive logical conclusions and verify the validity of mathematical or logical statements without human intervention.
-
B.
formal grammar notation
A formal grammar notation is a precise symbolic system for defining the syntactic structure of languages by specifying how valid strings can be generated from a set of production rules.
-
C.
cellular automaton
A cellular automaton is a discrete computational model consisting of a grid of cells, each in one of a finite number of states, that evolve over time according to simple local rules based on the states of neighboring cells.
-
D.
logic for concurrent systems
Logic for concurrent systems is a formal framework for specifying and reasoning about the behaviors, interactions, and correctness properties of systems in which multiple processes execute and communicate simultaneously.
-
E.
hierarchy of formal grammars
A hierarchy of formal grammars is an organized classification of grammars into levels based on their generative power and structural constraints, such as the Chomsky hierarchy from regular to recursively enumerable languages.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68856d7808190ab33ee914640281b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:32 p.m.