Triple
T6961862
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adobe Fresco |
E161386
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsColorMode |
P52856
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RGB |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RGB | Statement: [Adobe Fresco, supportsColorMode, RGB]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsColorMode Context triple: [Adobe Fresco, supportsColorMode, RGB]
-
A.
supportsColorSampling
Indicates that one entity can perform or accommodate color sampling operations on another entity or its data.
-
B.
hasColorOption
Indicates that an entity offers or supports a particular color as one of its selectable options.
-
C.
supportsWideColorGamut
Indicates that one entity provides or enables compatibility with a wide color gamut capability for another entity or context.
-
D.
colorSystemCompatibleWith
Indicates that one color system can be accurately used, interpreted, or converted within the context of another color system without loss of intended color meaning.
-
E.
hasColorModel
chosen
Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular color representation model (such as RGB, CMYK, or HSV) for defining its colors.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68853cff881908439d488924a8283 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6daf07e3481909aa79b8e0f1b1be7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d7c0b0a08190b262dfc94992994d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:30 p.m.