Triple
T6961661
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intel Core Solo |
E161382
|
entity |
| Predicate | powerOptimized |
P73803
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Intel Core Solo, powerOptimized, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: powerOptimized Context triple: [Intel Core Solo, powerOptimized, true]
-
A.
powerOptimizationFor
Indicates a relationship where one entity is used to improve, manage, or optimize the power consumption or power efficiency of another entity.
-
B.
powerBudgetCharacteristic
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s power consumption limits, allocations, or constraints are specified as a characteristic or parameter.
-
C.
powerBudget
Indicates the allocated or allowable amount of power that can be used or consumed by an entity or system within specified limits.
-
D.
powerCharacteristic
Indicates a relationship where one entity has a specific power-related property, capacity, or performance attribute characterized by the other entity.
-
E.
powerScope
Indicates the extent or domain within which an entity’s power, authority, or influence is valid or can be exercised.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68853cff881908439d488924a8283 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6daf07e3481909aa79b8e0f1b1be7 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d7c0b0a08190b262dfc94992994d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6d9bb57e88190a3a7cec34e3b617f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:30 p.m.