Triple

T6961566
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject British Light Brigade E161379 entity
Predicate resultOfCharge P73802 FINISHED
Object tactical failure LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tactical failure | Statement: [British Light Brigade, resultOfCharge, tactical failure]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: resultOfCharge
Context triple: [British Light Brigade, resultOfCharge, tactical failure]
  • A. chargeDetail
    Indicates a detailed specification of a financial charge, including its components, conditions, or breakdown within a transaction or billing context.
  • B. repaymentOutcome
    Indicates the result or status of a repayment action, such as whether it was completed, failed, or partially fulfilled.
  • C. chargesVia
    Indicates that one entity charges or powers another entity using a specified medium, method, or interface.
  • D. paymentPlaced
    Indicates that a payment has been initiated or submitted for processing in relation to a specific transaction or obligation.
  • E. commissionOutcome
    Indicates the result or consequence produced by a commission, such as whether it was successful, failed, or led to a particular decision or action.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68853cff881908439d488924a8283 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6daf07e3481909aa79b8e0f1b1be7 completed March 27, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7c0b0a08190b262dfc94992994d completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6d9bb57e88190a3a7cec34e3b617f completed March 27, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:30 p.m.