Triple

T6954053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kaylon E161195 entity
Predicate relationshipWithIsaac P74263 FINISHED
Object consider Isaac an emissary to biologicals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consider Isaac an emissary to biologicals | Statement: [Kaylon, relationshipWithIsaac, consider Isaac an emissary to biologicals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithIsaac
Context triple: [Kaylon, relationshipWithIsaac, consider Isaac an emissary to biologicals]
  • A. relationshipToJosephCooper
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that one entity has to Joseph Cooper.
  • B. relationshipToHannah
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Hannah.
  • C. relationshipToBenjy
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Benjy.
  • D. hasProtagonistRelationship
    Indicates that there exists a central, story-driving relationship involving the protagonist and another entity within a narrative.
  • E. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68852a9a0819097797e31d492e273 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6dacca12481908942ba793a104cc3 completed March 27, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7bf0a7c8190b5ed4aca22ba9b97 completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6dacb524c81909aade2282a4c0c01 completed March 27, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:29 p.m.