Triple
T694065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory |
E13857
|
entity |
| Predicate | consistencyStatus |
P16106
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not known to be provably consistent within itself |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not known to be provably consistent within itself | Statement: [Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, consistencyStatus, not known to be provably consistent within itself]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consistencyStatus Context triple: [Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, consistencyStatus, not known to be provably consistent within itself]
-
A.
continuityStatus
Indicates the state of whether something continues without interruption or has been broken, paused, or reset over time.
-
B.
canonicalStatus
Indicates the formal or official standing of an entity within an established authoritative or normative system.
-
C.
statusInLogic
chosen
Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
-
D.
standardizationStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of an entity in a formal standardization process (e.g., proposed, under review, approved, deprecated).
-
E.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493406c408190957eeec9048a8fb6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4a0b1e1d08190bdd42f57be5c2a6b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d23e0a08190b08be9d1eff2a1bb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:10 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:36 p.m.