Triple

T6939215
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Laplace law of error E160629 entity
Predicate excessKurtosis P74398 FINISHED
Object 3 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 3 | Statement: [Laplace law of error, excessKurtosis, 3]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: excessKurtosis
Context triple: [Laplace law of error, excessKurtosis, 3]
  • A. exponent
    Indicates that one quantity is raised to the power of another, expressing repeated multiplication of a base by itself.
  • B. constantExactness
    Indicates that a value or relationship holds with complete, unvarying precision, without any approximation or deviation.
  • C. hasEccentricity
    Indicates that an object or orbit possesses a specific degree of deviation from being perfectly circular, quantified by its eccentricity value.
  • D. allowsExponentType
    Indicates that one entity permits or supports the use of a specified type for an exponent in an operation or expression.
  • E. notableExponents
    Indicates that certain entities are especially prominent, influential, or exemplary practitioners or representatives of a given field, movement, or activity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6884f3db4819080ad65da69386206 completed March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e0c74fe48190aeaa018631e52ef6 completed March 27, 2026, 7:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7bd5a388190a57a96d925696ff6 completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c6e0c620f0819080e0ec49b36d4c30 completed March 27, 2026, 7:55 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:28 p.m.