Triple
T6924992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kings Peak |
E160281
|
entity |
| Predicate | USGSTopoMap |
P10300
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kings Peak |
E160281
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kings Peak | Statement: [Kings Peak, USGSTopoMap, Kings Peak]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kings Peak Context triple: [Kings Peak, USGSTopoMap, Kings Peak]
-
A.
Kings Peak
chosen
Kings Peak is a prominent mountain in the Uinta Range of northeastern Utah and the highest natural point in the state.
-
B.
Kaiser Peak
Kaiser Peak is a prominent mountain summit in California’s Sierra Nevada, known for its panoramic views over the surrounding Kaiser Wilderness and nearby lakes.
-
C.
Kom Peak
Kom Peak is a prominent summit in western Bulgaria’s Balkan Mountains, known as a popular hiking destination and a key landmark in the range.
-
D.
Eureka Peak
Eureka Peak is a prominent summit within the Twin Peaks area, known for its scenic views and hiking opportunities.
-
E.
Gannett Peak
Gannett Peak is the tallest mountain in Wyoming, located in the remote Wind River Range and known for its challenging alpine climbing and extensive glaciers.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6884d350081908d8a970e4d40ad78 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6da18b6388190947dfc1eb9e5d382 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c998a68c24819099abe74525830812 |
completed | March 29, 2026, 9:24 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:26 p.m.