Triple
T6922959
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FIRST and The LEGO Group |
E160230
|
entity |
| Predicate | emphasizesValues |
P17414
|
FINISHED |
| Object | gracious professionalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gracious professionalism | Statement: [FIRST and The LEGO Group, emphasizesValues, gracious professionalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emphasizesValues Context triple: [FIRST and The LEGO Group, emphasizesValues, gracious professionalism]
-
A.
hasEmphasis
chosen
Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
-
B.
positionEmphasized
Indicates that a particular position, stance, or role is given special prominence or stress relative to others.
-
C.
designEmphasizes
Indicates that a design intentionally places special importance or focus on a particular feature, principle, or aspect over others.
-
D.
strategyEmphasis
Indicates an entity’s primary focus or priority within a broader strategy or plan.
-
E.
valuedBy
Indicates that one entity is regarded as important, useful, or held in high esteem by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6884d350081908d8a970e4d40ad78 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d9fd159c819092a69d1a24e22dd5 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d7bb577c81908ee8b415b4281f3d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:26 p.m.