Triple
T6893179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yorta Yorta v Victoria |
E159099
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mabo v Queensland (No 2) |
E247734
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) | Statement: [Yorta Yorta v Victoria, relatedTo, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) Context triple: [Yorta Yorta v Victoria, relatedTo, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]
-
A.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
chosen
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
-
B.
Yolngu land rights movement
The Yolngu land rights movement is an Indigenous Australian campaign led by the Yolngu people of Arnhem Land to assert traditional ownership, protect sacred lands, and secure legal recognition of their land and cultural rights.
-
C.
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
-
D.
Crown in right of Queensland
The Crown in right of Queensland is the legal embodiment of the Australian monarch as the head of state specifically for the state of Queensland, underpinning its system of government and ownership of public assets.
-
E.
Crown in right of the Northern Territory
The Crown in right of the Northern Territory is the legal embodiment of the Australian monarch as the head of state specifically for the Northern Territory’s system of government and public administration.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6883568c8819081db6407e892cccc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d930ab548190953291d63cbc721b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c748d625908190b3b1f7cfe6360016 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 3:19 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:24 p.m.