Triple

T6891070
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Spanish language in Ecuador E159045 entity
Predicate dominantInRuralAreas P8344 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Spanish language in Ecuador, dominantInRuralAreas, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantInRuralAreas
Context triple: [Spanish language in Ecuador, dominantInRuralAreas, yes]
  • A. isPredominantlyRural
    Indicates that a place or region is characterized mainly by rural features, such as low population density and extensive non-urban land use.
  • B. hasRuralArea
    Indicates that an entity includes, is associated with, or contains a countryside or sparsely populated geographic area.
  • C. isInRuralAreaOf
    Indicates that one entity is located within the rural area or countryside region associated with another entity.
  • D. spokenInRuralAreasOf chosen
    Indicates that something (typically a language, dialect, or speech variety) is used or spoken primarily in the rural areas of a specified region or country.
  • E. advantageOverUrbanAreas
    Indicates that one entity (typically a rural or non-urban area) possesses a comparative benefit or favorable condition relative to urban areas.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6883568c8819081db6407e892cccc completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d92d45f08190a730b3842c95b521 completed March 27, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7b53e9881909ec298daa9f1913b completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:24 p.m.