Triple
T6888265
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dongying |
E158976
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounty |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lijin County |
E448656
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lijin County | Statement: [Dongying, hasCounty, Lijin County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lijin County Context triple: [Dongying, hasCounty, Lijin County]
-
A.
Lijin County
chosen
Lijin County is an administrative county in northeastern Shandong Province, China, situated on the Shandong Peninsula and governed by the prefecture-level city of Dongying.
-
B.
Linzhang County
Linzhang County is an administrative county under the jurisdiction of Handan City in Hebei Province, northern China.
-
C.
Linquan County
Linquan County is an administrative county in western Anhui Province, China, governed by the prefecture-level city of Fuyang.
-
D.
Yingshang County
Yingshang County is an administrative county in Anhui Province, China, governed by the prefecture-level city of Fuyang.
-
E.
Yangxin County
Yangxin County is an administrative county under the jurisdiction of Huangshi City in southeastern Hubei Province, China, known for its rural landscapes and growing industrial development.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6883568c8819081db6407e892cccc |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d9101e30819084695ba0003a255c |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7cbb542f08190bfea892ea90390b3 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 12:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:23 p.m.