Triple
T6878786
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | excessive deficit procedure |
E158738
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | budgetary surveillance procedure |
C5267
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: budgetary surveillance procedure Context triple: [excessive deficit procedure, instanceOf, budgetary surveillance procedure]
-
A.
budgetary planning exercise
A budgetary planning exercise is a structured activity in which individuals or organizations forecast income and expenses over a specific period to allocate resources, evaluate trade-offs, and ensure financial goals are achievable.
-
B.
budget coordination function
A budget coordination function is a mechanism or process that aligns, integrates, and manages financial plans and resource allocations across different units or activities to ensure coherent and efficient use of funds.
-
C.
audit function
An audit function is a systematic process or mechanism used to independently examine, verify, and evaluate records, operations, or controls to ensure accuracy, compliance, and effectiveness.
-
D.
administrative oversight regime
chosen
An administrative oversight regime is a structured system of rules, procedures, and institutions designed to monitor, review, and correct the actions and decisions of administrative bodies to ensure legality, accountability, and fairness.
-
E.
budgetary policy announcement
A budgetary policy announcement is an official communication by a government or authority outlining planned public revenues, expenditures, and fiscal measures for a specific period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68832af1481908ce356e133ebaebe |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:22 p.m.