Triple

T6867357
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mary McAfee Atkins E158440 entity
Predicate hasBequest P73110 FINISHED
Object endowment for an art museum in Kansas City LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: endowment for an art museum in Kansas City | Statement: [Mary McAfee Atkins, hasBequest, endowment for an art museum in Kansas City]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBequest
Context triple: [Mary McAfee Atkins, hasBequest, endowment for an art museum in Kansas City]
  • A. bequeathedBy
    Indicates that something has been left or passed on to an entity through the will or inheritance of another entity.
  • B. notableBequest chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a significant or historically notable bequest, legacy, or inheritance made by another entity.
  • C. bequestLocation
    Indicates the place or institution where a bequest is directed, stored, or intended to be received.
  • D. hadEstate
    Indicates that an entity possessed or owned a particular estate or landed property.
  • E. agreedHeir
    Indicates that one entity has been formally designated and accepted as the heir of another, typically through mutual agreement or legal arrangement.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68831e3648190a643c328122e4d43 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6da3ce95081909a424ac04bc7fa07 completed March 27, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d7b168908190b2f7c724b1bc7fc9 completed March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:21 p.m.