Triple
T6840746
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ulrich |
E157565
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMeaningApproximate |
P10718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | prosperity and power |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: prosperity and power | Statement: [Ulrich, hasMeaningApproximate, prosperity and power]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMeaningApproximate Context triple: [Ulrich, hasMeaningApproximate, prosperity and power]
-
A.
possibleMeaning
chosen
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
-
B.
commonMeaning
Indicates that multiple entities share the same or very similar meaning or semantic interpretation.
-
C.
hasMeaningViaJohn
Indicates that something possesses or conveys its meaning specifically through John as the interpretive or mediating agent.
-
D.
logicalMeaning
Indicates that one entity expresses, encodes, or conveys the logical content, implication, or formal meaning of another.
-
E.
hasSense
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular sensory perception, meaning, or interpretation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6882c53608190b99aebef079b23bd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d6b4a1f88190b4f532828697fbd8 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09f90648190bc0a462c7d59de1b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:19 p.m.