Triple

T6832843
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gaussian surface E157379 entity
Predicate typicalSymmetry P12998 FINISHED
Object spherical symmetry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: spherical symmetry | Statement: [Gaussian surface, typicalSymmetry, spherical symmetry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSymmetry
Context triple: [Gaussian surface, typicalSymmetry, spherical symmetry]
  • A. localSymmetry
    Indicates that an entity exhibits symmetry within a localized region or subset of its structure, rather than across its entire extent.
  • B. testsSymmetry
    Indicates that one entity evaluates or verifies whether a relationship or property holds identically in both directions between two entities.
  • C. typicalSymbol
    Indicates that something serves as a characteristic or commonly recognized symbol representing something else.
  • D. usesSymmetryGroup chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
  • E. typicalTopology
    Indicates the usual or most common network or structural arrangement that characterizes how the related entities are organized or interconnected.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882c53608190b99aebef079b23bd completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d62b1e8c8190a81d91191a54b073 completed March 27, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09d95f0819091ca7f897dc21efe completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.