Triple

T6827877
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject El hacedor E157060 entity
Predicate hasMetafictionalDevice P23847 FINISHED
Object author as character LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: author as character | Statement: [El hacedor, hasMetafictionalDevice, author as character]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMetafictionalDevice
Context triple: [El hacedor, hasMetafictionalDevice, author as character]
  • A. hasMetafictionalRole
    Indicates that an entity plays a role within a story that self-consciously comments on, references, or breaks the conventions of fiction itself.
  • B. hasNarrativeDevice chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs, contains, or is characterized by a particular narrative device used in storytelling or discourse.
  • C. hasFictionalFunction
    Indicates that an entity serves a role, purpose, or function within a fictional context or narrative.
  • D. hasPoeticDevice
    Indicates that one entity (typically a text or passage) employs or contains a specific poetic device present in the other entity.
  • E. hasFictionalForm
    Indicates that an entity has a counterpart or representation that exists within a fictional or imaginary context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882a5b5c8190917a7db9ed36bad1 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d6254bd88190a2a424537c2c12e2 completed March 27, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09d95f0819091ca7f897dc21efe completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.