Triple
T6825283
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | April DeBoer |
E156998
|
entity |
| Predicate | knownFor |
P22
|
FINISHED |
| Object | DeBoer v. Snyder |
E29124
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DeBoer v. Snyder | Statement: [April DeBoer, knownFor, DeBoer v. Snyder]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: DeBoer v. Snyder Context triple: [April DeBoer, knownFor, DeBoer v. Snyder]
-
A.
DeBoer v. Snyder
chosen
DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
-
B.
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide by ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
-
C.
Hollingsworth v. Perry
Hollingsworth v. Perry was a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that effectively restored same-sex marriage in California by dismissing an appeal over Proposition 8 for lack of standing.
-
D.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
E.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6882a5b5c8190917a7db9ed36bad1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d581ea5881908ba78c6bf1ce58ee |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c7426356a88190a36b53a46c1776e0 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.