Triple

T6825013
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kyocera E156991 entity
Predicate hasFounderRoleIn P5394 FINISHED
Object establishment of Inamori Foundation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: establishment of Inamori Foundation | Statement: [Kyocera, hasFounderRoleIn, establishment of Inamori Foundation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFounderRoleIn
Context triple: [Kyocera, hasFounderRoleIn, establishment of Inamori Foundation]
  • A. hasCoFounderRoleOf
    Indicates that one entity holds the role or position of co-founder in relation to another entity, such as an organization or venture.
  • B. founderRole
    Indicates that an entity serves as a founder in relation to another entity, specifying the role or capacity in which they established it.
  • C. hasCapitalOwnerRole
    Indicates that an entity holds the role or status of owning capital in relation to another entity or asset.
  • D. hasCapitalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds an official role, function, or status specifically associated with a capital city.
  • E. foundingRole chosen
    Indicates the specific role or capacity an entity held in the founding or establishment of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6882a5b5c8190917a7db9ed36bad1 completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d581ea5881908ba78c6bf1ce58ee completed March 27, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d09bb4f881909bf20c188cb3e8e1 completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:18 p.m.