Triple
T6814653
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Comité des Citoyens |
E156722
|
entity |
| Predicate | opposed |
P437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Louisiana Separate Car Act |
E498280
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Louisiana Separate Car Act | Statement: [Comité des Citoyens, opposed, Louisiana Separate Car Act]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Louisiana Separate Car Act Context triple: [Comité des Citoyens, opposed, Louisiana Separate Car Act]
-
A.
Louisiana Separate Car Act
chosen
The Louisiana Separate Car Act was an 1890 state law mandating racially segregated railway accommodations, which became the focus of the landmark Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court case upholding “separate but equal” segregation.
-
B.
Page Act of 1875
The Page Act of 1875 was a U.S. federal law that effectively curtailed immigration from China—especially of women—by targeting and excluding those stereotyped as prostitutes or forced laborers, laying groundwork for later Chinese exclusion policies.
-
C.
Cox v. Louisiana
Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Duncan v. Louisiana
Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
E.
Buchanan v. Warley
Buchanan v. Warley is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Louisville racial zoning ordinance, marking an early constitutional limit on government-enforced residential segregation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c68828b26c819090fe9df7612bbc27 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d32c40508190932718a649fc1417 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c723dd82048190969754b388a76913 |
completed | March 28, 2026, 12:42 a.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:17 p.m.