Triple

T6801005
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lagrange's four-square theorem E156185 entity
Predicate usesInProof P25490 FINISHED
Object properties of quadratic forms LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: properties of quadratic forms | Statement: [Lagrange's four-square theorem, usesInProof, properties of quadratic forms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesInProof
Context triple: [Lagrange's four-square theorem, usesInProof, properties of quadratic forms]
  • A. usedInProofStyle
    Indicates that one entity is employed as a method, technique, or approach within the proof style or strategy of another entity.
  • B. typicalProofUses
    Indicates that a proof characteristically or commonly employs a particular method, technique, or component.
  • C. areUsedIn chosen
    Indicates that certain entities serve as components, tools, or resources within a particular process, context, or application.
  • D. isUsedAs
    Indicates that one entity serves a particular function, role, or purpose as another entity.
  • E. usedInArgumentFor
    Indicates that something (such as a statement, piece of evidence, or concept) is employed as support within an argument advocating for a particular claim or position.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68826e6a48190a3d220b541e639de completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d2e595188190a0bb4b595df3adb2 completed March 27, 2026, 6:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d099bf08819089a9f9894d037e74 completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:16 p.m.