Triple

T6768225
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1984 Canadian federal election E154976 entity
Predicate secondPartyPopularVote P9215 FINISHED
Object about 3.56 million votes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: about 3.56 million votes | Statement: [1984 Canadian federal election, secondPartyPopularVote, about 3.56 million votes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondPartyPopularVote
Context triple: [1984 Canadian federal election, secondPartyPopularVote, about 3.56 million votes]
  • A. smithPopularVote
    Indicates that Smith received a specified number or share of votes in a popular vote election or ballot.
  • B. popularVote chosen
    Indicates the number or share of votes directly cast by the general electorate for a candidate or option in an election.
  • C. LabourPopularVote
    Indicates the proportion of total votes cast in an election that were received by the Labour Party.
  • D. popularVoteRunnerUp
    Indicates that one entity is the candidate who received the second-highest number of votes in a popular vote for the other entity’s election or contest.
  • E. popularVoteOutcome
    Indicates the result of a popular vote, specifying which option or candidate received the majority or winning share of votes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c68812ef7c819099369f51febb725c completed March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6d231b79c81908a4f7fa8f253706d completed March 27, 2026, 6:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c6d094105881909c5806eb4afa6306 completed March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:12 p.m.