Triple
T6756806
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | arms of Hungary |
E154480
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChargeColor |
P73311
|
FINISHED |
| Object | silver |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: silver | Statement: [arms of Hungary, hasChargeColor, silver]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChargeColor Context triple: [arms of Hungary, hasChargeColor, silver]
-
A.
isColorCharged
Indicates that an entity possesses color charge, meaning it carries the type of charge associated with the strong nuclear interaction in quantum chromodynamics.
-
B.
hasCharge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific electrical or formal charge, such as positive, negative, or neutral.
-
C.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
D.
chargeColour
Indicates that one entity assigns or possesses a specific color associated with an electrical or physical charge of another entity.
-
E.
containsCharge
Indicates that one entity includes, holds, or encompasses a specific charge associated with it.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880fd5808190be684854081e27dd |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d327e37081909d576e6eff9eec97 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6d09227108190b253b91967831a85 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6d3264b7481908816a4d19543fb7b |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:11 p.m.